Oh man, where to start?
It was a hoot to look through the older comics. Especially the romance ones - I think those might have been my favorite. Not because of its ingenuity writing or strong female roles. Not because of the drawings, which weren't the "worst" per se, but different enough for me to feel a little uncomfortable. No, it was the realization that hit me as I read through the pages of the romance comics, expecting at least some romance (or what realistically was safe for audiences in the 50s? 60s?) and reading nothing but the horrors of The Immoral Woman and what will happen if a woman is to continue to stay immoral. Of course, I'm not entirely sure about the demographic of woman readership for this genre of comic books back then, but I don't think it takes a genius to tell that these comics were clearly not written by women.
On the other hand, it was entertaining to read through many of Carl Bark's Donald Duck series. Personally, I prefer Uncle Scrooge as the main character, but perhaps that's because of my predilection for rich and intelligent gentleman ducks. I think a major difference in reading the more 'realistic' comics and the comics by Carl Barks is that everything isn't as stiff, or made out to be. Carl Bark's aimed to entertain, not give a lesson in the immoral paths of the human being. And although it was a little odd to hear that one of the characters in Carl Bark's comics was a woman who just happened to be the love interest of Donald Duck, it's sadly not surprising, especially around this time. Although, I question how people would have thought of it if it were a man who was the love interest of a female duck.